- this photo was blocked IMMEDIATELY with no opportunity for me to put it right (if, in fact, it's wrong). Thanks 
362700
362700
A bit harsh, I thought - this photo was blocked IMMEDIATELY with no opportunity for me to put it right (if, in fact, it's wrong). Thanks
- this photo was blocked IMMEDIATELY with no opportunity for me to put it right (if, in fact, it's wrong). Thanks Re: 362700
Show us this photo (for example on imageshack.us).
Last edited by Trajtek on 13 Oct 2009, 20:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 362700
As requested - photo is up at: http://profile.imageshack.us/user/dvigar/
Re: 362700
After all, at first glance, the picture is worse (compared to other photos on TWB). The vehicle is barely visible, the same picture is crooked, blurry and uninteresting. Besides, your photos aren't blocked just because they were made abroad.
Last edited by Trajtek on 13 Oct 2009, 22:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 362700
co autor miał na myśli?Trajtek wrote:Not to mention, that your photos don't be machined
Dave, I think, the main reason was the lack of sharpness - the lighting was correct...
Když inspekce přijde a optá se: ,Máte nějakou stížnost?`, tak musíš, smrade, stát hapták, zasalutovat a odpovědět: ,Poslušně hlásím, že nemám, že jsem úplně spokojen.` - Jak to řekneš, hnuse, opakuj to!
Re: 362700
Poprawione.JacekM1 wrote:co autor miał na myśli?Trajtek wrote:Not to mention, that your photos don't be machined
Re: 362700
mi nie chodzi o to że Ty teraz poprawiłeś ten jeden błąd, ale pisanie ze słownikiem albo translatorem, to tak niezbyt... są tutaj osobnicy którzy potrafią złożyć 3 zdania po angielsku, które jakoś brzmią, i można im zostawić pole do popisu...
eot
eot
Když inspekce přijde a optá se: ,Máte nějakou stížnost?`, tak musíš, smrade, stát hapták, zasalutovat a odpovědět: ,Poslušně hlásím, že nemám, že jsem úplně spokojen.` - Jak to řekneš, hnuse, opakuj to!
Re: 362700
Że co!?JacekM1 wrote:mi nie chodzi o to że Ty teraz poprawiłeś ten jeden błąd, ale pisanie ze słownikiem albo translatorem, to tak niezbyt...
Mniejsza...-
decomposed05
- Posts: 2664
- Joined: 19 Apr 2005, 00:00
- Contact:
Re: 362700
Hello David!
For me this photo has three problems:
1. Unsharp - it is unrecoverable
2. poor crop - you can crop better this photo - to cut shadows in low part of photo
3. askew - this photo is crooked. Please become familiar with this link: http://www.photoshopessentials.com/phot ... en-photos/
It is for photoshop but in GIMP the rules are the same (you can also straighen to rulers), you can correct perspective - tutorial: http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimp/s ... ective.htm
My version (still unsharp), with little bit better cropping:
For me this photo has three problems:
1. Unsharp - it is unrecoverable
2. poor crop - you can crop better this photo - to cut shadows in low part of photo
3. askew - this photo is crooked. Please become familiar with this link: http://www.photoshopessentials.com/phot ... en-photos/
It is for photoshop but in GIMP the rules are the same (you can also straighen to rulers), you can correct perspective - tutorial: http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/gimp/s ... ective.htm
My version (still unsharp), with little bit better cropping:
Re: 362700
Thanks Tomek - and others!
I agree with the comments about the quality of this photo - no problem for me. I was just a little sad that it was blocked immediately, with no message asking if I would change or improve it. Thanks for your help, everyone - I'll try harder!
I agree with the comments about the quality of this photo - no problem for me. I was just a little sad that it was blocked immediately, with no message asking if I would change or improve it. Thanks for your help, everyone - I'll try harder!